The Universal Formula

Theory Of Everything

There may be many ways to describe the basic principle of the universe.

The value of each option is contingent upon the degree of employability.

Also, the type of knowledge acquisition seems miraculous using heuristic methods.

In particular, when an applied solution template hides the numerous dead ends.

The topic is as old as the Stone Age cave paintings.

Man watching his environment and tries to abstract descriptions.

The object of observation I refer here and below as an object/event.

Any effective description requires a comparison.

The simplest comparisons, as swift as an arrow or for days we perform almost unconsciously.

The use of universal benchmarks give describing a new quality.

We live in space and time. All perceptible objects/events are located in time and space.

The next step suggests itself, declare space and time to base quantities and define base size units.

Substituting the basic parameters in relation to each other, are obtained derived variables

such as velocity and acceleration.

Comparing objects/events using the basic parameters obtaining universal descriptions.

Our conception of time and space is anyone's guess.

The validity is based solely on the derivability.

In fact you can't start without suspicions.

The acceptance of the correctness of the following statements I consider indispensable.

The human brain is with the german language (the english too) capable to perceive and describe

the basic principle of the universe!

The factors responsible for the perception of an object/event

are the factors of the basic principle!

The foregone basic principle can be applied to the imperceptible universe!

The universe is a closed system!

Each object/event has properties that make it unique.

If it was possible to identify all objects/events common basic characteristic and scale,

you could put any object/event with his property into consideration.

Universal basic parameters such as space and time would then be unnecessary and probably not real,

regardless of what the perception suggests.

How to get started?

First choose a random object.

What circumstances lead to the perception of the object/event?

The decisive factors are so banal that they can be easily underestimated.

The most obvious reason that causes perceiving the object/event,

is the fact it exists.

The way in which one perceives an object/event is determined by its property.

That's all it takes to describe the most common variant of the world formula.

      Object / event = existence x property

Any consideration object means:

     All = existence x property!


     Hairbrush = existence x property!

As befits a universal formula includes:

     Universe = existence x property!

"In summary, although a category 1b TOE may one day turn out to be correct,

it may come to appear somewhat arbitrary and thus perhaps disappointing to scientists

hoping for a TOE elegantly answers all outstanding questions and leaves no doubt

that it really is the ultimate TOE. "

                                                                 Max Tegmark 1998

We live in a physical world, that follows mathematical rules.

However, to all mathematical phenomena don't exist physical

equivalents (1b TOE after Tegmark ).

While relatively easily handled in mathematics with infinite sets,

any attempt to generate an infinite number of real cause,

that depends on personal ability, the universe more or less

throwing off balance,without seriously getting to its goal.

The energy conservation law rules in a closed system and is contrary to the idea of ​​the real infinite amount.

These kind of thought processes are obsolete, considering,

that a universe whose only continuity be is changing, cannot be described without variables.

Moreover, the product and the factors of the world formula are variable.

It follows first-order logic is not enough to describe the world formula.

This also means 1a TOE after Tegmark can not exist.

The reference was made in the world formula as any belief which is based in approach on presumptions,

only the universal derivability proves the validity.

Always in discourse with other closed worldviews which manage with seemingly fewer assumptions.

Some of the most important (part of) worldviews define itself in the approach about their relationship with energy.

Without understanding the phenomenon energy, it may be used in the formula.

Energy = existence x property.

If one considers the classical physics and the relativistic physics in the light of the world formula,

that the approaches energy = work, and energy = mass can be generalized to

energy = existence.

A common approach explains the partly complementary nature of the two worldviews.

The absence of the characteristics in a case leads to the exclusion of the friction and

in the other case is missing the "counterweight" to the mass.

The result is the black hole problem.

Black holes are extremes of the universe.

Thus they are among the easiest objects to describe.

Black holes have minimal existence with maximum properties

(the beginning of all entropy).

In contrast, arrive at Planck's description of quantum of action existence and property together.

Energy = h (quantum of action) x f (frequency)

By h is the smallest existence and f as a property.

This is the world formula limited to the smallest existences.

Despite the limited validity it is the base of quantum mechanics.

Boltzmann succeeded using the atomic model to show a vivid description of entropy.

Considering that atoms are not the reality, but a model of reality, you can describe the general entropy.

Entropy is, at a constant energy, the increase in existence due to declining properties!

In an expanding universe, the entropy is the predominant rationale.

That's the moment when i should introduce the remaining players.

If space and time are not real, what made us believe it?

As already indicated all objects/events are basic characteristics in common.

The space-time illusion and the observation of an inhomogeneous, not non-interacting

universe point to two types of basic characteristics.

An opposite and a supplementary character are to be expected.

The basic black and white relationship is the dynamic-static interplay.

The static basic characteristic of all objects/events is fluctuation.

The universal base size is τau, the oscillation period.

Property and basic size are inversely proportional.

That is, the more intense the property is, the shorter the period of oscillation τ.

The dynamic basic characteristic is less familiar to us.

But the character of the property results analogous.

The dynamic basic characteristic of all objects/events is the distance.

The universal base size is λambda, the clearance.

The more intense the property, the smaller λ.

The ratio of the base sizes of objects/events determines the propagation velocity c.

The propagation speed can take values ​​between zero and infinity.

So space and time are the reciprocals of the dynamic and static basic properties

of the universe.

Properties do not exist independently.

Objects/events exist and have properties.

Frequency is defined by the reciprocal of the oscillation period.

The oscillation period is the reciprocal value of the static property.

This means frequency = property.

One can also understand that object and event are two terms for the same phenomenon now.

Whether we refer to something as an object or event depends on the existence-property relationship

and the ratio from the basic properties.

If one has internalized the principle the world formula encounters everywhere.

- Object = quantity x quality

- Light = brightness x color

- Sound = volume x pitch

- Power = work / τ

- Force = work / λ

- Force = pulse / τ

- Force = mass x acceleration

The property acceleration is in turn a ratio of the basic properties

λ / τ x τ.

It is characterized by the constant change in the ratio of basic properties.

- Heat = mass x temperature; molecular self-excitation; 1 / τ

- Pressure = mass x molecule distance; 1 / λ

Heat and pressure are synergistic.

They share a common existence with two basic properties.

- Particles = mass x wave

- Element = quantity x density

- Electric power = electric current x voltage

- Gravity = mass / τ

(τ-earth = 193 million years; τ-moon = 579 million years; τ-sun = 22 years)

Analogous to heat and pressure, I think the electricity is synergistically to magnetism.

The common existence is the amount of moving charge carriers.

The separation of the charge carriers (elec.Voltage) corresponds to the dynamic basic characteristic.

The magnetic property must match the static basic characteristic, previously undescribed.

In this way it can go on.

If you have not understood the basic principle, is to evaluate the derivatives as arbitrary assertions.

So only the basic principle and then derive even!

Further thoughts suggest that the universe is a semi-open system in equilibrium with the other half-open systems.

The findings apply system-independent.

The assumption of a closed system promotes internal solution search

and prevents a problem shifting outward.

Entitled would be the objection my thoughts were naive and amateurish.

I can not disagree with my 95 percent perception gap.

But that happen to all humans and people too!